Re: IESG's Review of EMSD Specification
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IESG's Review of EMSD Specification
- To: mohsen@neda.com, iesg@ISI.EDU, paf@swip.net
- Subject: Re: IESG's Review of EMSD Specification
- From: braden@ISI.EDU
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 08:42:06 -0800
- Cc: braden@ISI.EDU, jkrey@ISI.EDU, rfc-ed@ISI.EDU, records@neda.com
- Content-Length: 1641
- Posted-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 08:42:06 -0800
*> *> The review time is not per specification, but per Internet Draft. *> *> > The two week timeout for draft-rfced-info-banan-01.txt *> > expired on February 9, 1999. *> > *> > RFC-Editor> This RFC-to-be was submitted to the RFC Editor to be *> > published as *> > RFC-Editor> Informational: draft-rfced-info-banan-01.txt *> > *> > RFC-Editor> Two week timeout is initiated (9 February 1999). *> *> The review of draft-rfced-info-banan-01.txt is almost ready, took the *> two weeks, and the result of the _two_week_review_time_ will be *> discussed at the IESG meeting today, thursday. *> *> Patrik *> Uh, oh. There is a catch-22 here. It is to the advantage of the overall process that we end up publishing the best version of the text that we can. I spent some of my time reading and commenting on Mohsen's 00 draft, and as a result he produced the 01 draft. If he had thought you would use publication of the 01 draft as a reason to further delay action, he might not have published the 01 draft, resulting in an RFC based on the 00 draft. I know this has been difficult for you IESG folks, as it has for the RFC Editor. Can't we bring it to closure soon? Bob Braden *> ------------------------------------------------------------------ *> Area Director, Applications Area Email: paf@swip.net *> IETF URL: http://paf.se *> PGP Key ID: 0xBD236602 *> *> In theory there is no difference between theory and practice, *> but in practice, there is. *>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IESG's Review of EMSD Specification
- From: Patrik Fältström <paf@swip.net>
- Re: IESG's Review of EMSD Specification
- Prev by Date: Re: IESG's Review of EMSD Specification
- Next by Date: Re: IESG's Review of EMSD Specification
- Prev by thread: Re: IESG's Review of EMSD Specification
- Next by thread: Re: IESG's Review of EMSD Specification
- Index(es):